Harnessing technology for agricultural transformation: A design thinking approach to alleviate Nigeria's food crisis

Aderonke B. Sakpere(1), Ejiroghene John(2), Ebenezer A. Chris(3), Rumana K. Aminu(4), Adejoke Opeyemi-Ogunbire(5),


(1) University of Ibadan
(2) Rivers State Senior Secondary Schools Board
(3) Ellizer Tech Services
(4) F.C.T College of Education Zuba, Abuja
(5) Desire Health Inclusive Organization, Lagos
Corresponding Author

Abstract


The design thinking process is a human-centered, iterative methodology that designers use to solve problems and often results in an innovative approach to problem solving. Using a User Centered Design approach by applying the design thinking process, the researchers sought to know: 1. What national challenges were priority for Nigerians and 2. What solutions were best to tackle the problem that had the highest votes. To understand the need assessment, a survey form was designed and disseminated. A total of 406 participated in the poll, with over 70% votes for agriculture as the problem that requires urgent attention in Nigeria. Further research revealed post-harvest loss as a predominant problem in Nigeria’s agricultural sector. Key stakeholders in the sectors including farmers and agricultural experts were interviewed to further empathize, understand and redefine the problem. The design thinking process helped to refine the problem statement and identify other problems as well as potential solutions. From the survey, it was clear the majority of Nigerians who participated felt that agriculture and post-harvest loss were high priority needs that required urgent attention. Applying design thinking to prioritize agriculture in Nigeria reveals its power to address complex socio-economic issues effectively. By deeply understanding stakeholders' needs, clearly defining the problem, and iteratively developing and refining solutions, design thinking ensures that interventions in agriculture are not only relevant and impactful but also sustainable and scalable. This approach aligns perfectly with the urgent need for agricultural development in Nigeria to mitigate economic instability and enhance food security.

Keywords


Food security, post-harvest loss, agriculture, user centered design, design thinking process, human-centered design, iterative methodology

References


Prince AI, Ehi OE, Brown-Ofoeme MN, Collins O, & Alobele IA (2023). Social Policies and Poverty Reduction in Africa: A Nigeria-centered Perspective. IIARD J. Human. Soc. Policy, 9(1), 49-77.

Obani EF (2023). Nexus Between Good Governance and Economic Transformation in Nigeria. African Journal of Humanities and Contemporary Education Research, 12(1), 132-149.

Nnamani CJ & Mbaeyi-Nwaoha IE (2023). Nigeria’s food insecurity crisis: a look at food politics. Brazilian Journal of Science, 2(6), 75-83.

Anam BE, Ijim UA, Ironbar VE, Otu AP, Duke OO, & Achuk Eba MB (2024). Economic recovery and growth plan, economic sustainability plan and national development plan (2021-2025): The Nigerian experience under President Muhammadu Buhari. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2289600.

Brown T (2008). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review.

Nigeria Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. (2021). Annual Report: Agricultural Sector Performance in Nigeria

Razzouk R & Shute V (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important?. Review of educational research, 82(3), 330-348.

Parizi R, Prestes M, Marczak S, & Conte T (2022). How has design thinking being used and integrated into software development activities? A systematic mapping. Journal of Systems and Software, 111217.

Alhazmi A & Huang S (2020). Integrating design thinking into scrum framework in the context of requirements engineering management. In Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (pp. 33-45).

Matthews J & Wrigley C (2017). Design and design thinking in business and management higher education. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 41-54.

Frisendal T (2012). Design thinking for business analysis. In Design Thinking Business Analysis (pp. 15-24). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Ku B & Lupton E (2022). Health design thinking: creating products and services for better health. MIT Press.

Wolniak R. (2017). The Design Thinking method and its stages. Systemy Wspomagania w Inżynierii Produkcji, 6.

Target TH 2021. Design thinking: an innovative approach for addressing contemporary realities in higher education. UNIVERSITY NEWS, 59(18), p.3.

Carlgren et al. (2016) Framing design thinking: The concept in idea and enactment. Creativity and Innovation Management.

Hurst ZM & Spiegal S (2023). Design thinking for responsible agriculture 4.0 innovations in rangelands. Rangelands, 45(4), 68-78.

Marat-Mendes T, Isidoro I, Catela J, Pereira M, Borges J, Lopes SS & Henriques C (2021). Drivers of change: how the food system of the Lisbon Metropolitan Area is being shaped by activities, initiatives and citizens' needs towards a sustainable transition. Cidades. Comunidades e Territórios, (Sp21).

Simon S (2023). The role of Design Thinking to promote a sustainability transition within participatory urban governance: Insights from urban agriculture initiatives in Lisbon. Urban Governance.

Sigauke E (2020). Connecting urban agriculture with design thinking: a case study from Zimbabwe. The Journal of Environmental Education, 52(1), 53-68.

Castanho A, Brites C, Rocha C, Pinto Moura A, Oliveira JC, & Cunha LM (2023). Adaptation of the food choice questionnaire using a design thinking approach and application to rice consumption by the major European consumers. *Food Quality and Preference, 110,* 104951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104951

Baxter KA, Kerr J, Nambiar S, Gallegos D, Penny RA, Laws R, & Byrne R (2024). A design thinking‐led approach to develop a responsive feeding intervention for Australian families vulnerable to food insecurity: Eat, Learn, Grow. Health Expectations, 27(2), e14051.

Pandey A, Sharma SD, Rawat A, Dalakoti D, & Kumar GR (2024, January). Designing a better food system in India: A Design Thinking Approach. In 2024 IEEE 1st Karachi Section Humanitarian Technology Conference (KHI-HTC) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.

Massari S, Principato L, Antonelli M, & Pratesi CA (2022). Learning from and designing after pandemics. CEASE: A design thinking approach to maintaining food consumer behaviour and achieving zero waste. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 82, 101143.

Waidelich L, Richter A, Kölmel B, & Bulander R (2018). Design thinking process model review. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) (pp. 1-9). IEEE.

TechWomen — TechWomen is an Initiative of the U.S. Department of State's Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs

Bowen RE & Riley C (2003). Socio-economic indicators and integrated coastal management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 46(3-4), 299-312.

Okereke OC (2017). Causes of failure and abandonment of projects and project deliverables in Africa. PM World Journal, 6(1), 1-16.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 32 times
PDF Download : 18 times

DOI: 10.57046/JJEG3473

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Proceedings of the Nigerian Academy of Science

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.